Skip to content
Sacred Forest · Programme d'Incubation
Sacred Forest · Readiness Report

Sacred Forest · Readiness Assessment

Readiness Report
Yawanawá & Noke Kũi

Project readiness assessment for Forest 02 — shared Yawanawá + Noke Kũi territory, Rio Gregório region, State of Acre (Brazil).

By Mathilde · 30 June 2026

Overall score

78%
Implementation-ready

The project can be launched with normal risk management.

01 · Visual

Radar view

Forest Rights Threats Community Economy Representative org. Project Narrative Stakeholder

02 · Synthesis

Overview by category

Category Weight Score Status
Forest 1.2× 75% Strong
Rights & tenure 1.3× 75% Strong
Threat actors 1.1× 70% Mid-High
Community & culture 63% Needs work
Economy 0.9× 80% Strong
Representative organisation 1.2× 80% Strong
Project readiness 0.9× 79% Strong
Narrative assets 0.8× 100% Strong
Stakeholder landscape 83% Strong

03 · Diagnostic

SWOT analysis

Strengths

  • Full legal recognition with rights — solid tenure foundation
  • Trusted project leadership — solid relational foundation
  • Vast, high-integrity forest — strong carbon and biodiversity asset
  • Formal tenure with reliable enforcement — reduces permanence risk
  • Capable representative organisation — operationally ready
  • Compelling narrative — highly fundable and communicable
  • Favourable stakeholder environment
  • Strong forest ↔ economy alignment — built-in conservation incentive
  • Advanced project setup — leadership, plan and team converging

Weaknesses (severe gaps)

  • Development disparities between villages and between the two Indigenous Peoples (Yawanawá / Noke Kũi) regarding women's leadership, institutional capacity, international engagement, ethno-tourism, and experience managing external partnerships.

Opportunities

  • Narrative + org capacity = fundable on current REDD+ and biodiversity credit markets
  • The scale of the forest qualifies for jurisdictional REDD+ or Article 6 mechanisms
  • Legal recognition creates a defensive moat — to be strengthened before threats escalate

Risks (emerging concerns)

  • FPIC practised on an ad-hoc basis only — robust consent process to be formalised
  • Moderate persistent pressure — baseline at risk of erosion during the project design phase
  • Conservation plan still at concept stage — substantial planning effort before launch
  • Implementation team in formation — leadership, roles and capacities still emerging

04 · Priority workstream

Action plan

The only category below 65% — prioritised by weight × gap.

Community & culture

63%
  • Strength of customary governance system

    Now: Functional Next: Strong / widely respected
  • Community cohesion and leadership quality

    Now: Moderate Next: Strong
  • Role of women in leadership and decision-making

    Now: Limited Next: Involved
  • Out-migration (4 = stable, low migration)

    Now: High / youth leaving Next: Significant
  • Community buy-in for conservation project

    Now: Mixed positive Next: Enthusiastic
  • Demographic pressure and growth (4 = balanced)

    Now: High pressure / rapid growth Next: Moderate pressure
  • Internal conflict (4 = peaceful, no factions)

    Now: Some tensions Next: Peaceful / cohesive

05 · Detailed scoring

The 9 categories

Each category broken down by question, with Mathilde's field notes.

Forest

75%

Biophysical condition and conservation value

Territory size
200–500K ha (2/4)
Forest integrity (4 = intact)
Mostly intact, some pressure (3/4)
Active forest defence system critical
Active, partial community support (3/4)
Spiritual and cultural value of the forest
Deep / central to identity (4/4)

Field notes

Territory shared between 2 ethnic groups.

Rights & tenure

75%

Legal recognition and enforcement of territorial rights

Legal recognition of the territory critical
Formally recognized with full rights (4/4)
Effective enforcement of rights by the State critical
Inconsistently enforced (3/4)
Land disputes and encroachments (4 = none) critical
Latent / occasional (3/4)
FPIC experience with external partners
Limited / ad hoc (2/4)

Field notes

A strong culture of dialogue and consultation exists between community representatives, as well as between the two Indigenous Peoples, for any decision or initiative affecting the territory as a whole. However, there is a significant gap in experience and institutional readiness between the Yawanawá and the Noke Kũi regarding the development of international partnerships, the implementation of international projects, and the formalisation of FPIC procedures.

Threat actors

70%

Extractive pressure and political risk

Intensity of extractive pressure (4 = low)
Moderate / persistent (2/4)
Political protection of threat actors (4 = none) critical
Grey area / ambiguous (3/4)
Community capacity to respond to threats
Developing (3/4)
Geography of threat actors (4 = local, more addressable) critical
Local–national mix (3/4)
Legality of threat actors (4 = illegal, politically unsupportable)
Grey area / mixed (3/4)

Community & culture

63%

Governance, cohesion, culture, demographics

Strength of customary governance system
Functional (3/4)
Community cohesion and leadership quality
Moderate (3/4)
Role of women in leadership and decision-making
Limited (2/4)
Out-migration (4 = stable, low migration)
High / youth leaving (1/4)
Community buy-in for conservation project critical
Mixed positive (3/4)
Demographic pressure and growth (4 = balanced)
High pressure / rapid growth (1/4)
Strength of traditions (4 = strongly traditional)
Strongly traditional (4/4)
Internal conflict (4 = peaceful, no factions)
Some tensions (3/4)

Field notes

Again, notable cultural differences can be observed between the Yawanawá and the Noke Kũi, particularly regarding the role of women in leadership. Over recent decades, Yawanawá women have become pioneers throughout the region and across Amazonia, serving as inspiring role models for the advancement of women's leadership as political, spiritual and cultural leaders.

Conversely, the Noke Kũi maintain a more traditional social structure, where women generally have more limited participation in decision-making processes and leadership positions. This is partly linked to the fact that the Noke Kũi are among the Indigenous Peoples who have preserved their traditional language to the highest degree in Amazonia. Many women still have a limited command of Portuguese (although this is steadily improving), which can reduce opportunities for engagement with external partners, institutions and wider leadership networks.

On several occasions, Yawanawá women have expressed their wish to receive support to strengthen their existing initiatives by creating opportunities for knowledge exchange between Indigenous women. In particular, they have shared their desire to have the resources to invite women from neighbouring Noke Kũi communities to take part in such gatherings, fostering mutual learning, leadership development and greater recognition of women's contributions within their communities, while fully respecting the cultural values, governance systems and self-determination of each Indigenous People.

Economy

80%

Livelihood structure and incentive alignment

Forest dependency (livelihood motivation to protect)
Moderate (3/4)
Sustainable supply chains (NTFPs, agroforestry, tourism)
Nascent activities (3/4)
Cash economy integration (able to receive payments)
Moderate (3/4)
Youth employment and economic alternatives
Some options (3/4)
Internet & smartphone access
Widespread smartphone use (4/4)

Field notes

A significant difference can also be observed in the level of socio-economic development and international engagement between the Yawanawá and the Noke Kũi. The Yawanawá were among the first Indigenous Peoples of the State of Acre to establish international partnerships and develop a community-based model of cultural and regenerative tourism. Today, these initiatives have generated significant economic opportunities, strengthened their international visibility and supported long-term partnerships across several sectors.

By contrast, the Noke Kũi are among the most recent Indigenous Peoples in the region to begin engaging in this type of initiative. As a result, they currently have more limited access to sustainable economic opportunities, international networks and diversified income sources. However, the exceptional richness of their cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, medicinal practices, and the growing interest in their territory create strong potential for a rapid and sustainable development of community-based tourism, international partnerships and regenerative economic initiatives — provided that this growth remains community-led and aligned with their own priorities and governance.

Representative organisation

80%

Capacity of the community's partner organisation (e.g. VSG)

Credibility of leadership within the community critical
Trusted / strong (4/4)
Financial management track record critical
Some experience (3/4)
Experience with donors and external projects
Some experience (3/4)
Integration with the community base
Partial (3/4)
Technical talent and operational capacity
Developing (3/4)

Field notes

Although the Noke Kũi have not yet had the opportunity to develop international partnerships on the same scale as the Yawanawá, they have nevertheless started to build valuable institutional experience through negotiations with several Brazilian companies. These processes arose following infrastructure developments on their territory (including road construction and installation of electrical and internet infrastructure carried out without FPIC) and led to financial compensation agreements. Although these experiences are relatively recent, they are already significantly strengthening the community's capacities in governance, financial management, negotiation, institutional administration and project management, providing a solid foundation for future international partnerships.

Project readiness

79%

Operational feasibility on the ground

SF project leadership critical
Trusted community advisor (4/4)
Physical accessibility
Readily accessible (4/4)
Language bridge and communication
Well-bridged (4/4)
Operational security
Manageable risks (3/4)
Conservation plan critical
Initial concept / discussion (2/4)
Implementation team critical
Forming / informal (2/4)

Field notes

As the project is currently in its initial co-development phase, and as discussions with both Indigenous Peoples began as part of a strategic adaptation following the conclusion of negotiations with the Huni Kuin, only one relatively short and diplomatically discreet two-week field mission has been conducted to initiate discussions, explore initial thinking, and map opportunities and needs across both territories. As a result, it has not yet been possible to meet representatives of every village or to organise the broad collective consultations that will be carried out as the project progresses.

At this stage, Sacred Forest does not yet have a large operational team mobilised or established on the ground. Nevertheless, it has access to and means of drawing on a solid network of highly experienced local and international professionals, including specialists in Indigenous community engagement, conservation, regenerative agriculture, bioeconomy, and the design / implementation of development projects with Indigenous Peoples across Amazonia.

In addition, these existing relationships, combined with the team's deep and long-standing knowledge of the territories, the trusted connections with local leaders, and the strong culture of collective decision-making shared by both Peoples, provide a solid foundation for meaningful engagement. It is therefore reasonable to expect that once the project's objectives are understood and endorsed by key community representatives, interest and engagement will spread rapidly across the communities.

This is why we are currently co-developing an Indigenous Innovation & Incubation Lab with both Indigenous Peoples, through which three successive and progressive field missions will bring together representatives from several villages of both Peoples, creating opportunities for shared understanding, inter-community knowledge exchange, peer-to-peer learning, mutual inspiration and collective motivation. By allowing the two neighbouring Peoples to learn from each other, the incubation process aims to accelerate capacity building while fully respecting the culture, governance system, priorities and development pace of each People.

Narrative assets

100%

Communicability and attractiveness to funders

Forest story (scale, biodiversity, emblems)
Exceptional / world-class (4/4)
Peoples' story (cultural distinctiveness)
Compelling / unique (4/4)
Visitability for donors and media
Accessible (4/4)
International recognition (rulings, UNESCO, press)
Significant international recognition (4/4)
Community visual identity (photogenic quality)
Highly distinctive (traditional dress, ceremony) (4/4)
Community influencers and spokespeople
Internationally recognised (4/4)

Field notes

The State of Acre, and particularly the Rio Gregório region, stands out as home to one of the richest cultural, human, environmental and medicinal ecosystems in the world. This unique combination of exceptional biodiversity, living Indigenous knowledge systems and remarkably preserved cultures places the region at the centre of growing international interest and creates outstanding opportunities for international partnerships.

As a result, there is significant and rapidly growing potential for increased international visibility, conservation initiatives, scientific collaboration, regenerative tourism, bioeconomy and cross-cultural exchange. Beyond these assets, both Indigenous Peoples possess a strong culture of communication, artistic expression and celebration, rooted in a way of life deeply grounded in artistic and cultural expression and the shared joy of living (só alegria!). Many community members are naturally inclined and sincerely motivated to become ambassadors not only of their cultures, but also of their worldview, ways of living, values, understanding of current global challenges, and Indigenous perspectives on possible solutions for the future of the planet.

This is undoubtedly one of the most important, valuable, opportunity-rich and strategically significant aspects for Sacred Forest in developing long-term, trust-based relationships with the Indigenous Peoples of Acre, potentially enabling the organisation to exponentially strengthen and extend its mission of building international partnerships and advancing the Rewilding Minds initiative through collaborations with international brands.

Stakeholder landscape

83%

External political and funding environment

Government disposition towards the project critical
Neutral (3/4)
Donor and funder landscape
Some contacts (3/4)
Civil society and allied IP networks
Strong networks (4/4)

Field notes

A growing number of local, national and international initiatives are already under development across the territory, alongside a growing community of individuals ready to support these Indigenous Peoples — many of whom have experienced profound personal, professional and spiritual transformations through their encounters with the communities, their cultures and their traditional medicines. As a result, an expanding ecosystem, generally characterised by benevolence, authentic collaboration, mutual support and a shared sense of purpose, continues to develop, providing a solid foundation for future partnerships while preserving a spirit of integrity, respect and reciprocity.

Source

Sacred Forests Readiness Assessment — generated on 01/07/2026 · By Mathilde